Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Labour to tax bonuses to fund jobs for young people 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... jobs-young

Define 'starter job'.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:15 pm
Profile
Officially Mrs saspro
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Posts: 4955
Location: on the naughty step
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/10/labour-tax-balls-bonuses-jobs-young

Define 'starter job'.

If it's the same than "affordable housing" it's around 50k no?


Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:12 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
So they get a job for six months and employers get a subsidised employee. Then the subsidy runs out.

Can anyone see what can wrong with this?

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:23 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
There have been a variety of schemes along a similar idea over the last ten years or so. Some of them have worked really well - one in Wales reported 80% of the people who went through it then found permanent employment - and some of them have been, to put it bluntly, worse that useless. It stands a chance of doing some good.


Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:37 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Isn't that the way taxes work in general. People pay tax on their wages (inc bonuses) then the government spends them? Hardly news.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Mar 10, 2014 5:12 pm
Profile WWW
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
and some of them have been, to put it bluntly, worse that useless. It stands a chance of doing some good.

Wasn't there one recently that was less effective than actually doing nothing at all?

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:46 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
jonbwfc wrote:
and some of them have been, to put it bluntly, worse that useless. It stands a chance of doing some good.

Wasn't there one recently that was less effective than actually doing nothing at all?

There've been a couple that have managed minimal success rates while costing the tax payer significantly more than the benefit payments that would have been paid in the period. IDS's workfare scheme for one, which by any objective measure is a woeful failure.


Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:24 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
An actual jobs program is fine but trying to fund it from a specific tax will only encourage those who might be hit by it to do what they can to avoid it legally.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:44 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
bobbdobbs wrote:
So they get a job for six months and employers get a subsidised employee. Then the subsidy runs out.

Can anyone see what can wrong with this?


It’s like workfare then - a revolving door of cash and people needing training, usually from the start.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:40 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.