Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Take that, space junk! Australian scientists to zap debris 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014 ... ith-lasers

Image

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:08 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
There was a suggestion to send up a sticky ball to basically mop up everything and have atmospheric drag to bring it back to earth.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:32 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
There was a suggestion to send up a sticky ball to basically mop up everything and have atmospheric drag to bring it back to earth.

I can't imagine why a plan that ended with an enormous ball of space debris falling uncontrollably to earth wasn't universally applauded :).

Most of the feasible ones (to me) involve gathering and recycling it in orbit.


Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:49 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
You think recycling in space is more feasible than letting it burn up on reentry?

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:23 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
You think recycling in space is more feasible than letting it burn up on reentry?

Cost/benefit. Assuming you can control where the lumps come down and whether they do fully incinerate, that's relatively easy but it's also relatively wasteful, because then you keep having to ship more stuff up at vast expense - getting anything at all up the gravity well costs millions and millions of dollars. if you can collect what's up there, get even some of the raw materials back and turn them back into useful stuff, that's going to save you an absolute fortune.

OK, recycling flecks of paint is is always going to be next to impossible but there's a lot of stuff up there that can realistically be grabbed and broken down. And that's got to make more sense than just turning it into pointless fireworks.

IIRC I did see an estimate of how much stuff was up there in financial terms and it's unreal. You can look at it as just a mess that needs to get rid of but I see it as a potential goldmine. Almost literally.


Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:55 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
And the resources of the Earth are finite. We can't just keep wasting material like we do at the moment.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:34 am
Profile ICQ
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
And the resources of the Earth are finite. We can't just keep wasting material like we do at the moment.

I agree. Collecting it in space is and recycling is the best solution. Blasting it with lasers into smaller fragments might not be any better.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:02 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
big_D wrote:
And the resources of the Earth are finite. We can't just keep wasting material like we do at the moment.

I agree. Collecting it in space is and recycling is the best solution. Blasting it with lasers into smaller fragments might not be any better.

As the saying goes, all that does is turn a rifle round into a shotgun round. Doesn't really help at all. However, I don't think they're doing anything that aggressive. All they're doing is effectively using the photons in the laser as a 'force carrier', to literally push back against the line of motion of the debris to slow it down to the point where it can't maintain orbit any more. It's kind of similar to the idea of a solar sail. I did once see a demo where a company used a whopping great laser to 'push' a test object about the size of your fist about 20-30 feet up in the air. It is physically possible.


Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:58 am
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
big_D wrote:
And the resources of the Earth are finite. We can't just keep wasting material like we do at the moment.

I agree. Collecting it in space is and recycling is the best solution. Blasting it with lasers into smaller fragments might not be any better.

As the saying goes, all that does is turn a rifle round into a shotgun round. Doesn't really help at all. However, I don't think they're doing anything that aggressive. All they're doing is effectively using the photons in the laser as a 'force carrier', to literally push back against the line of motion of the debris to slow it down to the point where it can't maintain orbit any more. It's kind of similar to the idea of a solar sail. I did once see a demo where a company used a whopping great laser to 'push' a test object about the size of your fist about 20-30 feet up in the air. It is physically possible.

If that was the solution then installing a space based laser to do that to every small item within range could be effective.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:59 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Amnesia10 wrote:
If that was the solution then installing a space based laser to do that to every small item within range could be effective.

I'd imagine power supply is the factor. No national grid in space :). However you wouldn't need as much power as you've got much less atmosphere int he way.


Tue Mar 11, 2014 1:22 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Amnesia10 wrote:
If that was the solution then installing a space based laser to do that to every small item within range could be effective.

I'd imagine power supply is the factor. No national grid in space :). However you wouldn't need as much power as you've got much less atmosphere int he way.


Indeed. If only there was a way to convert essentially unlimited solar radiation into a power source. :D

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:45 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
Indeed. If only there was a way to convert essentially unlimited solar radiation into a power source. :D

What you need is a 500 foot wide magnifying glass.

Well, seriously, you can do it but it's logistically a bit tricky. Solar cells are nice, but they don't actually give you much power each. To build your space based death ray *cough* orbital debris dispersal system, you'd either need a whopping great solar array, or you'd need whopping great capacitors to continually build power into, which you then 'dump' into your laser to get the beam power you need. And whopping great capacitors weigh a lot and you've got to ship them up the gravity well. Or build them in space from materials you've gathered but we're eating our own tail here.

You COULD do it. You could build a solar powered battle station *cough* space junk incinerator. But it would be expensive to start with and you only get a return when you've finished clearing out low orbit and use it for blackmailing the world.


Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:12 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
Well, it's got to be on the list once the volcano lair is up and running :D

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:14 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Image

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:08 pm
Profile
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
davrosG5 wrote:
Indeed. If only there was a way to convert essentially unlimited solar radiation into a power source. :D

What you need is a 500 foot wide magnifying glass.

Well, seriously, you can do it but it's logistically a bit tricky. Solar cells are nice, but they don't actually give you much power each. To build your space based death ray *cough* orbital debris dispersal system, you'd either need a whopping great solar array, or you'd need whopping great capacitors to continually build power into, which you then 'dump' into your laser to get the beam power you need. And whopping great capacitors weigh a lot and you've got to ship them up the gravity well. Or build them in space from materials you've gathered but we're eating our own tail here.

You COULD do it. You could build a solar powered battle station *cough* space junk incinerator. But it would be expensive to start with and you only get a return when you've finished clearing out low orbit and use it for blackmailing the world.

You could combine solar cells to charge up capacitors. Also you do not need a lot of power. Just enough to get a small hotspot to emit photons/ions that can create counter thrust on each particle.

_________________
Do concentrate, 007...

"You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds."

https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTk

http://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21


Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:06 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.