View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Mon May 12, 2025 4:22 pm
Author |
Message |
Zippy
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:20 pm Posts: 3838 Location: Here Abouts
|

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/climbers-may-be-barred-from-uluru-1736427.html |  |  |  | Quote: An Australian government proposal to stop people from climbing the famed Uluru, in deference to the wishes of indigenous people, sparked debate today with lawmakers opposing the plan.
A draft management plan for the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park called for a ban on people climbing the 348-metre (1,142 ft) rock, which is sacred to local Aborigine people and visited each year by 350,000 people, half of them from overseas.
The plan for Uluru, formerly known as Ayers Rock, could be implemented within 18 months, but must be approved by national Environment Minister Peter Garrett after a two-month public consultation, a spokesman for Garrett said.
"Kevin Rudd must veto any plans by Peter Garrett to shut down Australia's world-famous Uluru climb," said conservative politician and environment spokesman Greg Hunt.
"Visitors from around Australia and the world would be stopped from completing the majestic and exhilarating journey," Hunt said.
The world heritage-listed rock, famed for its shifting red-ochre colours, is a top tourist drawcard and is climbed by more than 100,000 people each year, despite its central desert location and against the wishes of indigenous people.
"You can't go climb on top of the Vatican, you can't go climb on top of the Buddhist temples and so on and so forth," local elder Vince Forrester from Mutitjulu township told state radio.
|  |  |  |  |
I'm not sure what I think. On the one hand, it's something I'd really like to do one day, but on the other, it is an important place for the locals and I wouldn't want people climbing all over my sacred sites, but then, I prefer Avebury to Stonehenge because you can get up close and personal with the stones, but at the same time I agree that the majority of sacred sites (regardless of your persuasion) can't be climbed all over, and I'm not sure they should/would be, but most sacred sites aren't on the scale or magnitude of Uluru either.... I just don't know 
_________________The Official "Saucy Minx"  This above all: To Thine Own Self Be True "Red sky at night, Shepherds Delight"..Which is a bit like Shepherds Pie, but with whipped topping instead of mashed potato.
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:04 am |
|
 |
Fogmeister
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm Posts: 6580 Location: Getting there
|
Erm... riiiiiight, because it has only been known as Uluru very recently....  When I went there I didn't climb it. We were told about the tradition and sacredness of the site and the belief the Aboriginals have in it. We were also told that we could climb it if we wanted but none of us did.
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:26 am |
|
 |
ProfessorF
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm Posts: 12030
|
I couldn't believe that they'd got the permission to build a visitor centre, let alone climbing going on. If it's important to the people, then we should respect that.
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:36 am |
|
 |
okenobi
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm Posts: 4932 Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
|
The beliefs of the indigenous people need to be respected. Fact. I suspect that people are annoyed because it's a landmark site and tourist draw. Therefore, as always, there's money involved.
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:46 pm |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
The people of Porthpyran consider Chapel Rock to be a site of significant cultural, historical and religious interest - when is it getting protection then? 
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:15 pm |
|
 |
ProfessorF
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm Posts: 12030
|
Once they've been [LIFTED] on for centuries by the white settlers,and then spent decades seeking legal and cultural representation for the crap we put them through.
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:20 pm |
|
 |
cloaked_wolf
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm Posts: 10022
|
I swear I read about the planned banning of climbing Uluru years ago, in a Bill Bryson book.
The climbing of Uluru by non-indigenous people, IMO, demonstrates their attitude to the indigenous population. Imagine if people tried to climb the Kaba in Mecca.
_________________ He fights for the users.
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:52 pm |
|
 |
eddie543
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:53 pm Posts: 447 Location: Manchester
|
Hmm I can see that ending without anyone losing limbs, being stoned or shot... I love how tolerent people over there are... such worthy allies are the saudis.
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:16 pm |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
Cornwall's been [LIFTED] on by emmets for centuries... Anyhoo, it's a rock. I don't see why I have to respect other people's religions, it's a ROCK. There are no gods, I don't see why I should be restricted because some other people think the rock is magical. What's next, I can't burn bibles?
|
Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:56 pm |
|
 |
ProfessorF
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm Posts: 12030
|
So why make the point about the Cornish folk earlier then?
|
Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:27 am |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
I was being sarcastic. In reality no-one cares - it's just a rock.
|
Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:27 am |
|
 |
ProfessorF
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm Posts: 12030
|
Fair enough, and you're welcome to your views about God and the aboriginals creation stories, but it's their land and they should be able to make their own minds up about who gets access to the rock and who doesn't, God or no God. People do care.
|
Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:31 am |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
I would agree with you if they actually controlled the land, but like it or lump it a bunch of white Australians hold the reigns of power, and it's up to them. Personally I don't believe any modern, secular government should bow to any religious belief - that be the path to the dark side. Instead modern ethical rules should apply - if you aren't comfortable climbing the rock then that's your choice, but unless the rock is in danger of disappearing over the short term I think others should be allowed to exercise their own conscious decision on the matter.
|
Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:38 am |
|
 |
rubicon
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:58 am Posts: 188
|
Actually, the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park - where Uluru is located - is owned by the local Anangu Aboriginal people. They've leased the land to the national parks authority and jointly manage it with them. So you're wrong, they do control the land and a bunch of white people don't hold the reins of power, at least not at Uluru.
|
Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:57 am |
|
 |
okenobi
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm Posts: 4932 Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
|
Bollocks. It's not about "religion". It's about spiritual beliefs. The aboriginal people are due respect simply for maintaining their culture for this long, let alone because it's the decent thing to do and they have something that almost the entire western hemisphere has lost. Cornwall has been abused for centuries, but we're happy to engage with the British government in a variety of ways. It's just not the same. Besides, most people down here aren't anywhere near as spiritual as they would've been 1000 years ago. Modern secular governments are a farce. There are only haves and have nots.
|
Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:48 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|