Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Danny Alexander exposes 'secret' Tory plans for £8bn in cuts 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Danny Alexander exposes 'secret' Tory plans for £8bn in welfare cuts | Politics | The Guardian
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... d-benefits

Think people might begrudgingly have more respect for him now lol.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:52 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Danny Alexander exposes 'secret' Tory plans for £8bn in welfare cuts | Politics | The Guardian
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... d-benefits

Think people might begrudgingly have more respect for him now lol.


The Tories won’t say where they plan to make cuts - which tells us that either they themselves don’t know, OR they do know and it will be damaging to their election prospects. Either way, lack of transparency looks rather iffy to me.

My father in law has an interesting theory (and he’s a rampant Tory supporter too) which is this - the overall strategy for each party is not to win - but to lose. Why? The mess is far worse than we are being led to believe, it’s possibly worsened in the last five years, and no one wants to commit political suicide over having to deal with it. The Tories know what the real picture is, as do the Lib Dems, and Labour are smelling a smell they don’t like. So a hung parliament is, in fact, the desired goal.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:47 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
The Tories won't say where they plan to make cuts because there are no votes in telling. The rest of your father in law's theory is just the plot from a Rik Mayall sitcom in the 90s.

To squeeze that much cash out of social security spending in the next parliament you can go only two ways. One is as described there, and the other is to target pensioners by means testing the state pension. The second option is clearly preferable for technical reasons, but is also legally dubious, and liable to cause a bit of a voter problem.


Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:21 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.