Author |
Message |
forquare1
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm Posts: 5150 Location: /dev/tty0
|
Register ClickySounds encouraging. Virtualisation was playing a big part in the way the lab was run back in Sun, we had started to get rid of many physical boxes and started replacing them with various virtualisation technologies. In the space of 4U we had the equivalent of 30 machines for engineers to use, we were also working on a system that could give an engineer a VM in seconds using a mixture of VirtualBox on X64 and Solaris Zones on SPARC. When I can upgrade my server a little more, it will be virtualising more so I can save other computers for other things.
|
Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:46 pm |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|
It depends on what you use the servers for. We could (and long term, I want to) virtualise a couple of the servers, but we have a couple of Windows terminal servers, which you can't really virtualise so easily - they need the RAM and processing power, so reducing server count isn't as practical.
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:55 am |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
On my last project we visualised nearly all our servers, and on the project I started today the same is true. Its great for resilience and capacity flexibility. 
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:02 am |
|
 |
veato
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am Posts: 5550 Location: Nottingham
|
I'm writing this using a VMware VDI (Wyse terminal running Citrix Xendesktop)!
_________________Twitter Blogflickr
|
Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:15 am |
|
 |
james016
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm Posts: 1899
|
We have virtualised a couple of our servers. It was so simple to do. Hopefully will be doing more soon.
_________________ My Flickr PageNow with added ball and chain.
|
Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:48 am |
|
 |
shawpower
Has a life
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:46 am Posts: 12
|
We virtualised about 20 servers, including a clustered Exchange setup, citrix 4.5 farm, Active Directory servers, and a range of others ones. Very happy so far.
|
Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:40 pm |
|
 |
james016
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm Posts: 1899
|
Is it easy to virtualise Exchange? It was something we talked about at the office.
_________________ My Flickr PageNow with added ball and chain.
|
Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:14 pm |
|
 |
saspro
Site Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm Posts: 8603 Location: location, location
|
Very easy. Although I'm still a fan of giving exchange, sql & terminal services their own boxes with fast disks.
|
Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:52 am |
|
 |
koli
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm Posts: 1171
|
All our desktops are virtualised running on Citrix. We call them "my pretended pc in USA" 
|
Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:57 pm |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
I've left my main SQL cluster as hardware servers.
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:27 am |
|
 |
gavomatic57
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:30 pm Posts: 1757 Location: Cardiff, Wales
|
I'm sure Citrix is great from an admin perspective, but for the users it is dreadful. The PC's with local versions of Office are prized possessions around here.
_________________ G.
|
Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:42 am |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
Yeah been there it is not good.
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:46 am |
|
 |
koli
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm Posts: 1171
|
Only thing I don't like about Citrix is that I don't have enough RAM allocated on the server. I complained on our tech. support line but they keep telling me they can't give one user more ram. Apparently all users on the server share all the ram and they can't give me more. Is that correct or they are just making excuses? Though I like the processing power it gives me, latencies are good too...
|
Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:33 pm |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
I must admit I thought it was type of user / role that RAM was controlled at in Citrix, could be wrong though. 
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:43 am |
|
|