Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Emin may quit UK over tax 
Author Message
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 119
Location: West Wales
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
So if you work your arse off to set up a company, work at it day and night to make it successful and then when finally it's pulling in millions you 'won't mind' when the government takes more than half of what you're earning?

Pull the other one.

These are the people who have the money to up sticks and leave at a moment's notice. If we piss them off and they leave then the tax burden on the rest of us poor sods is only going to increase to make up for the shortfall.


Let them go! The truth is they all escape most tax any way. When I worked in the city, the partners used to spend millions of the company's cash on tax avoidance schemes so they paid as little as possible.

People who set up sucessful businesses rarely do so simply to make money, and once they are rich they don't need every penny they "earn". These people stay in Britain because its a great place to live. Peaceful, tolerant, law-abiding. If they hate tax so much let them go live in Barbados or Lichtenstein, or the Congo....

A lot leave in a flurry of soundbites only to return, more quietly after a while bored, or near scared to death with Amerika, or wherever...


Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:26 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
So if you work your arse off to set up a company, work at it day and night to make it successful and then when finally it's pulling in millions you 'won't mind' when the government takes more than half of what you're earning?

Not at all. I consider it a fair pay off for being in a country that gave me the opportunity to get to that position.

I also wouldn't employ an expensive accountant to help me avoid almost all of my tax that many high earners do.

Emin, she's full of crap, her "art" is crap and she can crap off.

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:29 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 6:50 am
Posts: 1911
Reply with quote
If they really care that much about avoiding their taxes they can simply do what Lord Rothermere; proprietor of Britain's most patriotic newspaper (the Daily Mail of course) did. He declared himself French for tax purposes.


Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:08 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
In the unlikely event that I find myself earning enough for it to matter, I might consider declaring myself dead for the tax porpoises.

Well, it's better than being French :lol:

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:07 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Just had a thought, are we having to make 'stars' out of the likes of Big Brother contestants simply because all the actual stars now live elsewhere? :oops:

What's the tax like in this respect in other countries, anyone know? :?

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:39 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 5048
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
What's the tax like in this respect in other countries, anyone know? :?

It's generally much higher in all EU countries that have a better standard of living, better infrastructure...

_________________
Fogmeister I ventured into Solitude but didn't really do much.
jonbwfc I was behind her in a queue today - but I wouldn't describe it as 'bushy'.


Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:21 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
These are the people who have the money to up sticks and leave at a moment's notice

Bye then. You do realise how many of them pay accountants to avoid tax rather than paying taxm right? And I don't mind us having a few less entrepreneurs buying Ferraris if it means a few more teachers buying cars built in Sunderland?

Jon


Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:23 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
These are the people who have the money to up sticks and leave at a moment's notice

Bye then. You do realise how many of them pay accountants to avoid tax rather than paying taxm right? And I don't mind us having a few less entrepreneurs buying Ferraris if it means a few more teachers buying cars built in Sunderland?

Jon


Sure, but then last time I checked a) we are screwing them for their off-shore accounts and b) tax evasion is a crime.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:11 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 994
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
These are the people who have the money to up sticks and leave at a moment's notice

Bye then. You do realise how many of them pay accountants to avoid tax rather than paying taxm right? And I don't mind us having a few less entrepreneurs buying Ferraris if it means a few more teachers buying cars built in Sunderland?

Jon


Even if they don't pay all their tax, the wealth created by new companies and new jobs is still worth something to the country. But they should pay a fair amount, all the same.


Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:37 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
Anybody know of a place where one can find an itemised list of what the tax income is spent on?

Just thinking that if people got the chance to see where their money was going they might be more inclined to pay a higher tax burden.

_________________
Jim

Image


Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:27 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
I was waiting for someone to post a picture of a plughole...

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:40 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 1171
Reply with quote
rustybucket wrote:
Just thinking that if people got the chance to see where their money was going they might be more inclined to pay a higher tax burden.


Funny that, I was thinking the exact opposite...

_________________
Image
Free Sim with £5 credit


Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:08 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
rustybucket wrote:
Anybody know of a place where one can find an itemised list of what the tax income is spent on?

Just thinking that if people got the chance to see where their money was going they might be more inclined to pay a higher tax burden.


Closest I've found is from here, using 2007's figures.

Quote:
What is the money spent on?

Again, the government has a handy list of areas it spends its money on:
Pensions: £65 billion
Other forms of “social protection”: £81 billion
Social services: £24 billion
Health: £90 billion
Transport: £18 billion
Education and training: £70 billion
Defence: £31 billion
Industry, agriculture, employment and training: £19 billion
Recreation, culture and sport: £11 billion
Housing and the environment: £18 billion
Public order and safety: £30 billion
Debt interest: £27 billion
Other: £39 billion

How does that work out per household?
Of the £8,720 spent each year for every man, woman and child in the UK, the breakdown is as follows:
Health: £1,490
Education and training: £1,160
Pensions: £1,080
Defence: £520
Policing, public order and safety: £500
Transport: £310
International aid: £70
Unemployment benefits: £70

Put another way, last year the government spent an average of £403 a week per household. Based on the amounts above, that includes:
£58.90 on health
£53.60 on education and training
£23.20 on policing, public order and safety
£14.20 on transport

That compares with average household spending of:
£59 on recreation and culture
£44.70 on food and drink
£23.90 on food and drink
£11.30 on tobacco, alcohol and narcotics

The inference from the government is clear: while us lot spend money on a combination of fripperies and necessities, its own spending on our behalf goes on serious stuff.
Of course, the counter-argument is that at least when we control our household budget we can make decisions about what to spend our money on. That is less obviously the case with the government.

How does UK spending compare with other industrialised nations?
Here, we are smack bang in the middle: we spend a lot more than the 36% in the United States, but a lot less than the 55% in France or the 57% in Sweden. However, we are below the 48% average for the world’s 29 leading industrialised countries.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:14 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
Quote:
* £44.70 on food and drink
* £23.90 on food and drink

I'm unclear. How much on what now?

Those figures are quite scary. I don't take home £400 a week, but I'd expect to be able to run a household on it.

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:53 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
jonbwfc wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
These are the people who have the money to up sticks and leave at a moment's notice

Bye then. You do realise how many of them pay accountants to avoid tax rather than paying taxm right? And I don't mind us having a few less entrepreneurs buying Ferraris if it means a few more teachers buying cars built in Sunderland?

Jon


Sure, but then last time I checked a) we are screwing them for their off-shore accounts and b) tax evasion is a crime.

Which is why I said 'avoidance'. My father was (until retirement) an investigator for the Inland Revenue. He spent his entire working life chasing people who thought they had found legal ways to not pay the tax the law said they should. There's a world of difference between evasion of tax and avoidance of tax. Mainly, as you say, that one will land you in jail if you get caught.

According to the radio this morning the government estimate is that tax avoidance and overdue payments on the UK were £100 billion last year. That's 100 billion. If people simply paid the tax they were supposed to for two years, the government finances will be rebalanced despite them being in the most catastrophic state in living memory.

And who is doing all this avoidance? who are pocketing most of this humongous pile of cash which should be going to the exchequer to be spent by the state? Large corporations and the extremely rich. Or, put another way, the people you seem to be suggesting the government should leave alone. Frankly, all the evidence suggests they're doing far too much of that as it is.

As I say, I have heard a lot about tax evasion and/or avoidance in my time; probably i more details than I really cared about. The idea that the rich are the people paying huge taxes, supporting the state and driving the economy is a myth, much the same as the free market is a myth and financial regulation in the city was a myth. The very rich stay very rich by paying people to make sure they pay hardly any taxes. This is the reality of the world. You could argue about it's merits morally or ethically but that's besides the point. The fact is if you take the wages of a company CEO or city trader and then take a group of say office workers such that the total gross wage of the two is the same, the latter group would have paid more taxes than the individual because they collectively don't have as good accountants.

Jon


Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:14 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.