Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Trains 'too costly' for rail firm 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
clicky
Quote:
Network Rail is transporting 200 staff by coach from Reading to Coventry for a conference because of the high cost of train tickets, it has emerged.

laugh or cry?

Quote:
The firm said it made no apologies for getting the "best value" for taxpayers.

Network Rail said it looks at cheaper options for journeys as part of cost-cutting, as its workers do not get free travel or discounts.

A spokesman added: "Whilst we have no role in setting train fares, we use rail for the overwhelming number of business journeys.

"Occasionally, if there is a cheaper alternative, we will use that."


and thus this is why the roads are congested. Public transport is no longer for the public but for some money grabbers who have fleeced a half witted government continuing with half baked transport policies, in herited from the previous mob but have decided that to do the right thing is far too great a task.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:11 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 4141
Location: Exeter
Reply with quote
I thought Network Rail simply provided hardware / labour, they don't actually run any of the services...

It's still pretty funny though.

_________________
"The woman is a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma I've had sex with."


Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:20 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
A 17 mile drive from here to my closest tube station saves me £10 per rail ticket, plus the £3+ bus fare from home to my local station. Even if you factor in the cost of parking (£1 weekends, £3 weekdays), that’s lunch easily covered.

Doing the maths a bit - a day out in London on a Saturday would cost the two of us £41+ in transport costs if we chose to travel from the local station. The same would cost £16 (plus petrol - bet that’s not more than about a couple of quid or so) from the tube station. That’s a difference of around £25.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:48 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
I'm really not looking forward to the day when my railcard is no longer valid. I'll have to buy a car, then. :(

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:50 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 6580
Location: Getting there
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
A 17 mile drive from here to my closest tube station saves me £10 per rail ticket, plus the £3+ bus fare from home to my local station. Even if you factor in the cost of parking (£1 weekends, £3 weekdays), that’s lunch easily covered.

Doing the maths a bit - a day out in London on a Saturday would cost the two of us £41+ in transport costs if we chose to travel from the local station. The same would cost £16 (plus petrol - bet that’s not more than about a couple of quid or so) from the tube station. That’s a difference of around £25.

This is something I have always said.

My dad lives 40 miles away. I can catch a train from Leeds City Centre to the station which is about 20 mins walk from my dad's house. It costs £19 per ticket for return.

If I went with my 2 sisters and one of my sister's boyfriends (we often go there on a weekend) then it would cost £76.

If I take them all in my car it costs around £10 - £15 in petrol (there and back) and that's it. I can come home whenever I like and that isn't including bus fare into Leeds.

Train prices are ridiculous.

_________________
Oliver Foggin - iPhone Dev

JJW009 wrote:
The count will go up until they stop counting. That's the way counting works.


Doodle Sub!
Game Of Life

Image Image


Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:08 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
I can cite multiple examples too and again the bottom line is that it is cheaper and quicker by car than public transport.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:53 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am
Posts: 6954
Location: Peebo
Reply with quote
Not always cheaper by car but it certainly is in a lot of cases.

Going to London from Peterborough - £18 return at the weekend on the train (about 80 miles, less than a 1/4 of a tank of petrol each way but there would be parking as well). Train works out about the same as the car and is probably a bit cheaper if you have to pay to park the car.

Going from Peterborough to Glasgow with the cheapest advance ticket - £16 each way. It's about 320 miles so the train thrashes the car... unless two of you are going in which case it's about even.

Still, I never normally have to travel at commuter times in which case the car pretty much wins every time.

_________________
When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum.
-Billy Connolly (to a heckler)


Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:46 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 4876
Location: Newcastle
Reply with quote
Reading to Newcastle was approx equal depending on time of day for the length of journey and cost in my car

Saying that, National Express (failure) have erected sh*tty ticket stiles in Newcastle train station, despite the fact that no one wants them, and they slow down everyone, and won't stop people travelling without tickets

_________________
Twitter
Charlie Brooker:
Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.


Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:26 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
davrosG5 wrote:
Not always cheaper by car but it certainly is in a lot of cases.

Going to London from Peterborough - £18 return at the weekend on the train (about 80 miles, less than a 1/4 of a tank of petrol each way but there would be parking as well). Train works out about the same as the car and is probably a bit cheaper if you have to pay to park the car.

Going from Peterborough to Glasgow with the cheapest advance ticket - £16 each way. It's about 320 miles so the train thrashes the car... unless two of you are going in which case it's about even.


That’s the thing - volume. It would be cheaper if we took the car into London if three or more were travelling. Any petrol and parking fees can be split by the number of people travelling, and this starts to reduce the over all cost. You only have to park one car, not four for example.

Maybe train companies need to look more at volume discounts...

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:13 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:16 pm
Posts: 704
Location: Leeds, UK
Reply with quote
Uhm.

I work for a rail company (Formerly NXEC)

Network Rail DO get free rail travel...


Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:12 am
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
Angelic wrote:
Uhm.

I work for a rail company (Formerly NXEC)

Network Rail DO get free rail travel...


No they don't only if you started before, I think, 1989. Its also not allowed for business travel only personal travel and commuting. ( ex railtrack )

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:43 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
A 17 mile drive from here to my closest tube station saves me £10 per rail ticket, plus the £3+ bus fare from home to my local station. Even if you factor in the cost of parking (£1 weekends, £3 weekdays), that’s lunch easily covered.

You forgot the 16 quid for mileage (according to the AA) for driving the car to the station. ;)

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:57 am
Profile ICQ
Has a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:21 pm
Posts: 91
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
Maybe train companies need to look more at volume discounts...


Some do. There is a groupsave scheme where 4 passengers travel for the price of 2. It's only off-peak day returns though.

http://www.daysoutguide.co.uk/group-save.aspx


Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:10 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.