Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Working civil servants harder could save £60bn - Tories 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8382271.stm

Quote:
The shadow public services productivity advisory board will feature a number of figures - yet to be named - described as "very senior advisers with established credentials".

A key Tory proposal is to move all government-owned property into central publicly-owned asset companies.

Government departments would then pay rent and the asset companies, using professional management, would be forced to squeeze as much as possible out of the government's real estate assets.

The Tories would also introduce greater competition within the public sector by allowing high-performing parts of it to bid to run other areas.

For example, a successful local authority planning department in one area could take charge of the planning responsibilities of a struggling council.

"What will matter to us is whether or not a successful outcome is delivered at an affordable price - not who delivers it," said Mr Hammond.


That could be so disastrous I don't know where to begin :shock:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Fri Nov 27, 2009 12:47 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
I remember the last wave of Tory reforms. Departments became “agencies” which were not directly linked to an minister. This meant that if something screwed up, the minister could say “nothing to do with me - it was the agency”. This is how your Income Support stopped being paid by the DHSS and started to be paid by the Benefits Agency. Of course, being agencies also meant that it could be run more like a business, and less like a government department.

We have seen similar tactics used in other areas where business concerns should be bottom of the list: health care, education, policing. I am surprise we don’t have a Defence of the Realm Agency operating the military. Imagine if you applied the proposed model to that.

The net result of all this “modernisation” is job losses. They can’t say “you will do more for less,” because it’s an election-losing thing to say.

I know some people working in the civil service. One was looking to pay off his mortgage in a few years and find something less bothersome to do. I suspect that this could scupper his plans.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:12 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 2 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.