Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Athlon II Vs. Phenom II 
Author Message
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:39 pm
Posts: 118
Location: Durkha-durkha-stan
Reply with quote
Ohai,
Is there really much difference between the two chip types?
And why such a huge price difference? (Suspect the first question will answer this aswell XD)
And would you guys really recommend a Phenom II X4 over a Athlon II X4 for general school work, internet browsing and odd bit of gaming as a cheap decent rig? Cheaper Athlon II X4 would allow me to buy a better gfx card which brings back the old argument of CPU Vs. GPU xD
(Bearing in mind I will upgrade at a later time)
Thanks
Alistair

_________________
UP THE IRONS!


Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:17 pm
Profile YIM
Has a life

Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:41 pm
Posts: 54
Reply with quote
The main design difference is that the Athlon II doesn't have any L3 cache and the Phenom II is available with faster clock speeds.

Here is a set of benchmarks comparing the two chip types.


Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:48 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:39 pm
Posts: 118
Location: Durkha-durkha-stan
Reply with quote
andytw wrote:
The main design difference is that the Athlon II doesn't have any L3 cache and the Phenom II is available with faster clock speeds.

Here is a set of benchmarks comparing the two chip types.


Thanks for the benchmarks was quite useful
Huge CPU nub atm - don't get what the caches are - know that its kinda the more the better and the higher mb the better but thats it xD

_________________
UP THE IRONS!


Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:29 pm
Profile YIM
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
The level 3 cache makes a huge difference. Essentially, the Athlons do ok in heavily threaded apps and are a lot of cores for little more. Aside from that, not worth it in the slightest.

However, I wouldn't recommend anything X4 from AMD at the moment as the pricing is nonsense compared with vastly better Intel equivalents.

If you insist on AMD, go either 770 chipset (MSI board is the only recommended one) or go 785/790GX and stick a Phenom X2 550BE. That'll cope with everything you want for now. If you buy an Asus board based on the latter chipsets, you have the option of potentially unlocking additional cores (which could be fun ;) ) You could then upgrade to X4 if you need to in the future.

Aside from all of that Intel are launching their new value end parts at CES this week and will no doubt shake up the entire market for sub £150 CPUs.


Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:52 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:39 pm
Posts: 118
Location: Durkha-durkha-stan
Reply with quote
One reason Im going AMD is that everything is so much cheaper xD
I mean a 17yr old student is pretty much screwed - I can get 4GB DDR3 a dual core AMD (@ 3.2) and a MSI C770 C45 for £250 - then another £100ish for a gpu and its a set-up thats decent and will last for a while.

Asked about athlon because there X4s @ 2.8ghz are going for £90 so wondered if it would be much of a boost over a Phenom II X2 that I was thinking of buying :S

Know very little about Asus' AM3 boards - will probs look them up (not sure what you mean about unlocking extra cores xD)

Regards
Alistair

_________________
UP THE IRONS!


Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:18 pm
Profile YIM
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Cookeh wrote:
(not sure what you mean about unlocking extra cores xD)



He might be talking about the triple-core chips IIRC - some are actually quads, but because the majority of the batch was found to be triple the fourth core is disabled and it's sold as triple. It's something like that, and that's all IIRC. ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:33 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:39 pm
Posts: 118
Location: Durkha-durkha-stan
Reply with quote
Oh THAT'S what he meant xD Knew about that - but no reference was made to the X3s xD

_________________
UP THE IRONS!


Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:39 pm
Profile YIM
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
Some X2s can be unlocked too. To become either triple or quad core. Only Asus allow you to pick triple core if your chip won't run stably as a quad. X3 is hard to find now (unless you like buying from shoddy companies like Overclockers ;) )

You clearly haven't heard about the pricing for the new i3 chips. The i3-530 is supposed to be around £80-90 and gives Athlon X4 beating performance. Also, you need the same 4gigs you were gonna buy and you can stick it in a P55 motherboard, so you have the option of upgrading to i5 or i7 at a later date. Unless AMD drop prices in the next week, there will be no advantage to buying one that I can see.

I would've gone X2 550BE, Asus 785G board and 4gig, until this week. But the i3-530 with an £80 board (Gigabyte P55-UD2) is all of about £20 more expensive (if that) and more overclockable, more future-proof and far better as far as power consumption, heat and efficiency.


Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:02 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Some X2s can be unlocked too. To become either triple or quad core. Only Asus allow you to pick triple core if your chip won't run stably as a quad. X3 is hard to find now (unless you like buying from shoddy companies like Overclockers ;) )

You clearly haven't heard about the pricing for the new i3 chips. The i3-530 is supposed to be around £80-90 and gives Athlon X4 beating performance. Also, you need the same 4gigs you were gonna buy and you can stick it in a P55 motherboard, so you have the option of upgrading to i5 or i7 at a later date. Unless AMD drop prices in the next week, there will be no advantage to buying one that I can see.

I would've gone X2 550BE, Asus 785G board and 4gig, until this week. But the i3-530 with an £80 board (Gigabyte P55-UD2) is all of about £20 more expensive (if that) and more overclockable, more future-proof and far better as far as power consumption, heat and efficiency.


The major price advantage with buying AMD extends beyond the CPU to the mobo as well.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:43 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
okenobi wrote:
Some X2s can be unlocked too. To become either triple or quad core. Only Asus allow you to pick triple core if your chip won't run stably as a quad. X3 is hard to find now (unless you like buying from shoddy companies like Overclockers ;) )

You clearly haven't heard about the pricing for the new i3 chips. The i3-530 is supposed to be around £80-90 and gives Athlon X4 beating performance. Also, you need the same 4gigs you were gonna buy and you can stick it in a P55 motherboard, so you have the option of upgrading to i5 or i7 at a later date. Unless AMD drop prices in the next week, there will be no advantage to buying one that I can see.

I would've gone X2 550BE, Asus 785G board and 4gig, until this week. But the i3-530 with an £80 board (Gigabyte P55-UD2) is all of about £20 more expensive (if that) and more overclockable, more future-proof and far better as far as power consumption, heat and efficiency.


The major price advantage with buying AMD extends beyond the CPU to the mobo as well.


Except that a board with a decent chipset for core unlocking and better voltage regulation than the 770 is £70 anyway. As I said above, only £10 cheaper than P55. As the CPU is only £10 cheaper, that's £20ish total.


Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:14 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:39 pm
Posts: 118
Location: Durkha-durkha-stan
Reply with quote
Its worth looking into - and no I hadnt heard about i3's xD Sure they're not just renamed the c2q's and changed the socket? :lol:
The potential of a X2 becoming X3/4 or X3 becoming X4 is very tempting though - again will have to look into that; what asus boards run it though? The M4A series?
Regards

_________________
UP THE IRONS!


Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:47 am
Profile YIM
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
The new i3 is based on the same architecture as it's bigger bros the i5 and i7. It massively outperforms a C2D and appears to overclock very well, even at this early stage. It's also a 32nm chip with integrated GPU on die (although that's 45nm). Technologically, very, very interesting and a taste of what is to come in the next 12-18mths.

As for boards, it's all of these:
Image

However, if going AMD (which I was considering recently) but staying on a budget, I would go with this one:

http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Asus-M4A785TD-V-EVO-AMD-785G-AM3-PCI-E-20(x16)-DDR3-1800(OC)-1600(OC)-SATA-II-SATA-RAID-VGA

Well reviewed and has mostly everything you could want, but is still sub-£70.


Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:18 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
i3/i5 tests, worth reading:

http://www.techradar.com/reviews/pc-mac ... ?artc_pg=1

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/rev ... 1-part-cpu

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:47 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 446
Location: ~/
Reply with quote
Cookeh wrote:
Huge CPU nub atm - don't get what the caches are - know that its kinda the more the better and the higher mb the better but thats it xD


Basically, your PC's RAM runs much more slowly than its CPU, therefore the CPU will often sit there waiting for data to come from RAM. What the CPU cache does is keep some of the data that the CPU has recently used, as it runs at the same speed as the CPU is is accessed much more quickly and reduces the time that the CPU is waiting.

How much the CPU's cache speeds things up is entirely application specific, some developers will even aim to write code that's small enough to sit in the cache and therefore not fetched from RAM.

_________________
I was nickholway on the old boards.


Thu Jan 07, 2010 9:19 am
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:39 pm
Posts: 118
Location: Durkha-durkha-stan
Reply with quote
Ah cheers, makes sense now :D

_________________
UP THE IRONS!


Thu Jan 07, 2010 5:31 pm
Profile YIM
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.