Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
NAS Hard Drives 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1057
Reply with quote
One of our servers is being mostly used just as a data storage and this is running out.

I've looked at something like the Buffalo Terrastation III 2Tb system but wondered if that will be suitable for around 20 people to access every day or is it more designed as archive storage?

Anyone using one?

_________________
Image


Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:35 pm
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm
Posts: 8603
Location: location, location
Reply with quote
We've installed some ReadyNAS NV's in to clients sites for archive purposes, they're not bad. I wouldn't use one for a frequently used data store though.

_________________
Support X404, use our Amazon link
Get your X404 tat here
jonlumb wrote:
I've only ever done it with a chicken so far, but if required I wouldn't have any problems doing it with other animals at all.


Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:22 pm
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
saspro wrote:
I wouldn't use one for a frequently used data store though.


Interesting, any particular reason why not?

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm
Posts: 8603
Location: location, location
Reply with quote
AlunD wrote:
saspro wrote:
I wouldn't use one for a frequently used data store though.


Interesting, any particular reason why not?


Far too slow ever on gigabit network. An 8GB folder could take 12 hours to copy to a temp folder for burning to CD.

_________________
Support X404, use our Amazon link
Get your X404 tat here
jonlumb wrote:
I've only ever done it with a chicken so far, but if required I wouldn't have any problems doing it with other animals at all.


Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:34 pm
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
saspro wrote:
AlunD wrote:
saspro wrote:
I wouldn't use one for a frequently used data store though.


Interesting, any particular reason why not?


Far too slow ever on gigabit network. An 8GB folder could take 12 hours to copy to a temp folder for burning to CD.


:shock: That's terrible.

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:55 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
AlunD wrote:
saspro wrote:
Far too slow ever on gigabit network. An 8GB folder could take 12 hours to copy to a temp folder for burning to CD.


:shock: That's terrible.


Yeah, he's gonna need some dual layer DVDs, not CDs.
;)

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:50 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 134
Reply with quote
saspro wrote:
AlunD wrote:
saspro wrote:
I wouldn't use one for a frequently used data store though.


Interesting, any particular reason why not?


Far too slow ever on gigabit network. An 8GB folder could take 12 hours to copy to a temp folder for burning to CD.


1gb/s = 8 secs for 1GB = 8*8 = 64seconds, or one minute four seconds. Okay, that's an ideal scenario and the HDDs are probably only pumping out 60MB/s or 480Mb/s but that must be a heck of a lot of tiny files for it to take twelve hours to move.

I was thinking about moving our office across to a NAS box for synchronised file storage, but the costs of a four disk solution with RAID 1+0 and dual 1Gb/s network seemed quite high; before you even consider the 1TB SAS drives (enterprise storage so that we get 1.3m hrs MTBF.)

If the networking would be an issue too then that would be pretty bad.


Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:09 pm
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1057
Reply with quote
Well we now have a NetGear NAS device - has 3Tb storage space on Raid5 array and we are using that to backup our main servers every night as part of our disaster recovery plan.

First time it took 54hrs to backup 1.2Tb information but it is an incrimental system and last nights backup took just over 4hrs to backup the changes - some 80Gb - and then it also replicates itself onto an external hard drive which is taken off-site.

Been running this system for a week now and very impressed - easy to replace a file/folder if a user deletes it by mistake as its a simple drag n drop affair.

_________________
Image


Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:08 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 446
Location: ~/
Reply with quote
Assassin8or wrote:
1gb/s = 8 secs for 1GB = 8*8 = 64seconds, or one minute four seconds. Okay, that's an ideal scenario and the HDDs are probably only pumping out 60MB/s or 480Mb/s but that must be a heck of a lot of tiny files for it to take twelve hours to move.


TBH I don't see that kind of consistent throughout off our SAN with 15k FC disks, so I'd be quite surprised if a small SATA unit can sustain that kind of throughput.

Quote:
I was thinking about moving our office across to a NAS box for synchronised file storage, but the costs of a four disk solution with RAID 1+0 and dual 1Gb/s network seemed quite high; before you even consider the 1TB SAS drives (enterprise storage so that we get 1.3m hrs MTBF.)

If the networking would be an issue too then that would be pretty bad.


Do they make 1TB SAS disks yet?

_________________
I was nickholway on the old boards.


Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:04 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 134
Reply with quote
Coref wrote:
Assassin8or wrote:
1gb/s = 8 secs for 1GB = 8*8 = 64seconds, or one minute four seconds. Okay, that's an ideal scenario and the HDDs are probably only pumping out 60MB/s or 480Mb/s but that must be a heck of a lot of tiny files for it to take twelve hours to move.


TBH I don't see that kind of consistent throughout off our SAN with 15k FC disks, so I'd be quite surprised if a small SATA unit can sustain that kind of throughput.

Quote:
I was thinking about moving our office across to a NAS box for synchronised file storage, but the costs of a four disk solution with RAID 1+0 and dual 1Gb/s network seemed quite high; before you even consider the 1TB SAS drives (enterprise storage so that we get 1.3m hrs MTBF.)

If the networking would be an issue too then that would be pretty bad.


Do they make 1TB SAS disks yet?


Well, you'll see much better results with larger files or monolithic compressed files.

And yes, but they're just 7200RPM drives with the SAS technology in them and longer warranties than desktop drives. We have them in RAID arrays in two of our web servers and they reasonably good.

SAS is supposed to be about 30% faster than SATA II


Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:24 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm
Posts: 8603
Location: location, location
Reply with quote
Can't say I've ever seen 1TB SAS drives. I've had midline 1TB sata's in hotswap bays but never a SAS drive bigger than 300GB

_________________
Support X404, use our Amazon link
Get your X404 tat here
jonlumb wrote:
I've only ever done it with a chicken so far, but if required I wouldn't have any problems doing it with other animals at all.


Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:30 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 446
Location: ~/
Reply with quote
saspro wrote:
Can't say I've ever seen 1TB SAS drives. I've had midline 1TB sata's in hotswap bays but never a SAS drive bigger than 300GB


We're both wrong :oops: I've just spotted that HP do some 7.2k 1TB SAS disks @ £450 a pop.

_________________
I was nickholway on the old boards.


Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 pm
Profile WWW
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm
Posts: 8603
Location: location, location
Reply with quote
Coref wrote:
saspro wrote:
Can't say I've ever seen 1TB SAS drives. I've had midline 1TB sata's in hotswap bays but never a SAS drive bigger than 300GB


We're both wrong :oops: I've just spotted that HP do some 7.2k 1TB SAS disks @ £450 a pop.



Shame they're not running at proper speeds though.

_________________
Support X404, use our Amazon link
Get your X404 tat here
jonlumb wrote:
I've only ever done it with a chicken so far, but if required I wouldn't have any problems doing it with other animals at all.


Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:43 am
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 140
Location: The Interwebs
Reply with quote
JohnSheridan wrote:
Well we now have a NetGear NAS device - has 3Tb storage space on Raid5 array and we are using that to backup our main servers every night as part of our disaster recovery plan.

First time it took 54hrs to backup 1.2Tb information but it is an incrimental system and last nights backup took just over 4hrs to backup the changes - some 80Gb - and then it also replicates itself onto an external hard drive which is taken off-site.

Been running this system for a week now and very impressed - easy to replace a file/folder if a user deletes it by mistake as its a simple drag n drop affair.



Hi john, just wondering what your RTO is if you ever did have to restore from backup in the event of a full failure?

even taking into acount the asynchronisity of the read write process from the NAS, thats going to be significantly longer than 1 business day to restore everything?

That might not be the emphasis of your DR plan but I was just curious?

_________________
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair."
- Douglas Adams


Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:55 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1057
Reply with quote
Well our DR plan involves our offsite IT providers having one of the external drives with our complete system on so they can replicate our systems their end as a virtual server.

Once a month we will swap the hard drive for another and they will update this virtual server so in the event of a total-loss we can just log-in remotely to this virtual server and carry on working whilst they go about replacing the hardware for us.

_________________
Image


Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:33 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.