Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
still need some help with small lens stuff :( 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
need a general use lens for when Im off to france (and jamaica) soon, only got that horrid 50mm lens and the 70-200 one for my D80, should I buy this?

http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-nik ... #bvreviews

or this one?

http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-nik ... s/p1001800

should I avoid "DX" lenses?

also would anyone know any websites where I can pay for the lens bit by bit rather than paying it all in one big chunk,

thanks :cry:

_________________
Image


Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:06 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I have that first lens you link to (14-24mm).
Unless you plan on upgrading your camera in the short to mid term there's no reason why you should avoid a DX lens.
If there's any specific questions you have about the 14-24mm lens then feel free to ask.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:12 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
well firstly what site did you buy it from? and were you able to pay for it bit by bit? :shock: shame I cant have a play around with the lens on the site before purchasing :cry: u got any test photos perchance? or standing in same place and having it zoomed out fully and zoomed in fully? etc? :cry:

_________________
Image


Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:24 pm
Profile
Officially Mrs saspro
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Posts: 4955
Location: on the naughty step
Reply with quote
Edd:

brataccas wrote:
perchance?

That's the spirit!

Try Jessops for looking at trying before you buy, or similar. Also, in my eyes, if you can't afford it up front, you can't afford it.


Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:50 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
TheFrenchun wrote:
Also, in my eyes, if you can't afford it up front, you can't afford it.


I have to say, I agree.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:51 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
:cry:

_________________
Image


Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:40 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
brataccas wrote:
well firstly what site did you buy it from?
I didn't buy it online. I got it from a physical shop down in Dublin.
brataccas wrote:
and were you able to pay for it bit by bit?
Nope. The place that I bought it from actually broke up a Nikon D3 + that lens bundle to sell it to me, as he was finding it (understandably) tough to sell the brand new D3 with a brand new one of those lenses.
brataccas wrote:
shame I cant have a play around with the lens on the site before purchasing
Have you thought about renting one from a shop for a couple of days?
brataccas wrote:
u got any test photos perchance? or standing in same place and having it zoomed out fully and zoomed in fully? etc? :cry:
I have test images on my Flickr account - they don't all have the lens data attached to them though so if you can't work out which of the images were taken at 14mm then I'll link directly to them.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:53 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
TheFrenchun wrote:
Edd:
brataccas wrote:
perchance?
That's the spirit!
(8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:55 pm
Profile WWW
Has a life

Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:41 pm
Posts: 54
Reply with quote
Jessops offer 6/12 months interest free credit depending on the total value of the purchase but as has been said by others unless you have the money (of most of it) upfront then you probably shouldn't be buying the lens.

The two lenses you linked are very good, but is there nothing similar available for the Nikon mount that is more affordable without sacrificing too much quality/speed :?:

While I lust after the Zeiss glass available for my Sony, I've realised that I am better off spending money elsewhere until I can justify the cost.


Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:10 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
There's nothing wrong with your 50mm. Just get to grips with it. Put it on your camera for a days shooting, think about what you're trying to achieve and just use it.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:56 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
If money is tight then the Tamron 17-50 is a lot cheaper and gets favourable reviews.

Or if you need a general 'one lens for everything' thats not overly expensive then the Tamron 18-200 / 18-250 / 18-270 could do the job but obviously not as well as £1000 Nikon glass.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:41 am
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 638
Location: 3959 miles from the centre of the Earth - give or take a bit
Reply with quote
What about this?

_________________
i7 860 @ 3.5GHz, GTX275, 4GB DDR3


Sat Feb 13, 2010 12:58 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
not sure dogbert :( I had a 17-70 nikon DX F3.5 lens which I hated the photo quality of it so much that I binned it :cry:

_________________
Image


Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:32 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
brataccas wrote:
a 17-70 nikon DX F3.5 lens
Ohh, I think I have one of those as well and I quite like it as a general lens. I've certainly not noticed any drop on overall quality from that an my full frame lenses (well, other than the general loss in megapixels).
I'll check later to see if it is indeed the same lens as you had.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:18 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
ye, I remember you offered it to peter :shock:

_________________
Image


Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:46 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.