Reply to topic  [ 344 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 23  Next
James Cameron Says Sequels and "Battleship" are Ridiculous 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Supergirl.


Genius (esp. since the studios will greenlight anything comic-related), though allegedly they have the same mentality as the games makers that female leads don't sell :|

I don't mind remakes if the situation can't really get any worse - Highlander, Robocop, The Crow, Blade... All of those were getting redone, dunno what the current state of play is :)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:05 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Highlander, Robocop, The Crow, Blade...


I object. I've not seen The Crow, but the other three are all more than very good as standalone movies. Just because there are some gash sequels floating about, doesn't mean that
pcernie wrote:
the situation can't really get any worse
It really, really could.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:13 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Anyone else have any?

Mark

How about the Romulans in Star Trek?

They have appeared in every ST incarnation since season one of TOS in 1966. They are pretty much always antagonistic and just the mention of their name is enough to connote malice, aggression ,cunning and terror.

Whilst not as frequent as the Klingons, their much more cerebral nature seem to make any episode much darker than the Klingons seemed to manage. They, like any "Big Bad", seem to get wheeled out any time the writers want to create a feeling of evil. The film Star Trek: Nemesis was based pretty much entirely on this premise.

Just a thought.

_________________
Jim

Image


Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:28 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
pcernie wrote:
Highlander, Robocop, The Crow, Blade...


I object. I've not seen The Crow, but the other three are all more than very good as standalone movies. Just because there are some gash sequels floating about, doesn't mean that
pcernie wrote:
the situation can't really get any worse
It really, really could.


You haven't seen the original Crow? :?

The rest in the series that I've seen were just weird/crap IMO (Dacascos, Furlong). I'm of the opinion that if a series has become as 'tainted' as the ones I've mentioned, you may as well have another go since there's so little to lose. It's a bit like the Bond films where they often get increasingly silly until someone reins them in a bit, before the process starts over again...

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:35 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
You haven't seen the original Crow? :?


I wouldn't be in a rush to rectify that one, though, really...

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:47 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
pcernie wrote:
You haven't seen the original Crow? :?
I wouldn't be in a rush to rectify that one, though, really...
What would someone who actively likes Transformers know, though?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:50 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
rustybucket wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
Anyone else have any?

Mark

How about the Romulans in Star Trek?

They have appeared in every ST incarnation since season one of TOS in 1966. They are pretty much always antagonistic and just the mention of their name is enough to connote malice, aggression ,cunning and terror.

Whilst not as frequent as the Klingons, their much more cerebral nature seem to make any episode much darker than the Klingons seemed to manage. They, like any "Big Bad", seem to get wheeled out any time the writers want to create a feeling of evil. The film Star Trek: Nemesis was based pretty much entirely on this premise.

Just a thought.


Don't count. Generally speaking a big bad appears for a single season. Although they may occasionally turn up subsequently, generally speaking they run for a season. The modern twist on this formula might be Harold Saxon from Who, but even he isn't just a catch all enemy who pops out whenever. Whereas the classic series "Master" was much more of a general villian, than a big bad. That's where the Daleks/Cybermen bear comparison to Romulans/Klingons/Cardassians etc.

Plus, a big bad HAS TO make an appearance as the climactic baddie in the season finale.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:51 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 4932
Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
pcernie wrote:
You haven't seen the original Crow? :?


I wouldn't be in a rush to rectify that one, though, really...


I'm not. But thanks for the heads up :)


Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:52 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
What would someone who actively likes Transformers know, though?

Mark


We all know robots can't act, and it's Michael Bay at the helm.
What was Brandon Lee and Alex Proyas excuse?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:04 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
Plus, a big bad HAS TO make an appearance as the climactic baddie in the season finale.

Gotcha.

I understand now - I stopped watching popular TV just before Buffy turned up.

_________________
Jim

Image


Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:06 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
okenobi wrote:
ProfessorF wrote:
pcernie wrote:
You haven't seen the original Crow? :?


I wouldn't be in a rush to rectify that one, though, really...


I'm not. But thanks for the heads up :)


Unless I'm misreading things here, The Crow is quite a good/likeable film with a gritty tone that runs the whole way through the film, as opposed to today's 'What do you mean it isn't a 12a?!' :(

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:14 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
The Crow is quite a good/likeable film with a gritty tone that runs the whole way through the film, as opposed to today's 'What do you mean it isn't a 12a?!' :(


Or, it's not, and it's actually pretentious wannabe-goth nonsense with the world's worst roof top guitar solo in the rain.
Your choice.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:17 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
I actually think I'll just give my password to Prof and he can post for me from now on, it's really pointless us both commenting on things.


Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:19 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
pcernie wrote:
The Crow is quite a good/likeable film with a gritty tone that runs the whole way through the film, as opposed to today's 'What do you mean it isn't a 12a?!' :(


Or, it's not, and it's actually pretentious wannabe-goth nonsense with the world's worst roof top guitar solo in the rain.
Your choice.


Believe me I wouldn't have sat through it were that truly the case (it might have inspired a few of those plonkers though), and it's one of the few examples of a film outshining the source material, though I didn't know that at the time.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:41 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
When I watched "The Crow" I didn't get on with it.

I thought it was more famous for what happened during filming than for the results.

Meh.

_________________
Jim

Image


Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:49 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 344 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 23  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.