| Author |
Message |
|
bobbdobbs
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
|
clickySo its back to the original iPhone model.. all web based and no apps for anything that has a subscription model.
_________________Finally joined Flickr
|
| Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:04 am |
|
|
|
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
|
Excuse me about not being at all concerned about the fortunes of a Murdoch-owned newspaper.
|
| Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:34 am |
|
|
|
mikepgood
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:23 pm
Posts: 710
|
_________________
No Apples were used in the making of this post.
|
| Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:48 am |
|
|
|
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
|
The FT is owned by Pearson, not Rupert Murdoch.
|
| Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:01 am |
|
|
|
james016
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 1899
|
You just have the link on your home screen to their site. No loss to FT readers. Also the FT is not owned by Murdoch.
_________________ My Flickr PageNow with added ball and chain.
|
| Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:05 am |
|
|
|
l3v1ck
What's a life?
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
|
WTF is wrong with me? Yesterday I was agreeing with a Labour policy, today I'm agreeing with a Murdoch paper. I really need to see a doctor. 
|
| Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:13 am |
|
|
|
bobbdobbs
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
|
Its nice to see people mixing up the Times and the Financial Times owners  _________________Finally joined Flickr
|
| Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:43 am |
|
|
|
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
|
Apple were on to a loser with this.
"You can sell through us, but we'll take a bigger cut. Oh, and you can't charge more for an eBook or subscription if it is bought through us. Oh, and we won't let you have the information about the purchaser..."
Sounds like a big losing fail, for the content providers, from the outset.
_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
| Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:28 am |
|
|
|
Amnesia10
Legend
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:02 am
Posts: 29240
Location: Guantanamo Bay (thanks bobbdobbs)
|
I can see it from both perspectives but I do see that the content providers should have access to customers details, though customers should have the right to block such access especially if it results in more junk mail. For smaller publishers it is a benefit that they avoid the costs of distribution. _________________Do concentrate, 007... "You are gifted. Mine is bordering on seven seconds." https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTg5MzczNTkhttp://astore.amazon.co.uk/wwwx404couk-21
|
| Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:03 am |
|
|
