Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Ed Miliband defends climate change science 
Author Message
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8490251.stm

Quote:
He added it did not "undermine decades of climate research" and the "majority of scientists say that".


I wonder how many decades he's actually talking about, especially when a lot of the research from then has probably been proved wrong or misinformed - that's science for you, it doesn't stop.

Oh, and the "majority of scientists say that" statement is getting older by the second. You arse.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:02 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
This is coming from a minister in a government that only believes in the science that backs there position,which is decided before the evidence is assessed.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:19 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
Oh, and the "majority of scientists say that" statement is getting older by the second. You arse.


The majority of scientists may very well be wrong. It’s happened before, and getting them to admit it is a right battle. Science behaves like a religion - there is dogma and heretics.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:04 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
Well he was never going to turn round and say "Sorry we might be wrong, all these eco taxes are just a sly way to get extra money from people".

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:20 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
l3v1ck wrote:
Well he was never going to turn round and say "Sorry we might be wrong, all these eco taxes are just a sly way to get extra money from people".

No No No you are so wrong. Look at how much the environment has been saved by the addition of added tax onto petrol. The rain forests are growing back, the saharah is a veritable green paradise, lambs are lying down with the lion. The ice caps are increasing you cant swim in the seas due to the amount of whales in there!!!

<sarcasm.. just a bit honest>

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:20 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 447
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:

I wonder how many decades he's actually talking about, .

About 28 years of rising temperatures at the end of the last century that can be possibly pinned on man, just maybe of 0.4^C.
but it definately fills my belief in this THEORY with confidence.
Long story short: world endangering problem everyone wants to be superman and get taken in by saving the world propoganda. like all beliefs it becomes instutionalised and anyone who is a non believer gets excommunicated from the scientific community. When met with the possibillity of them being wrong all along they just trench up. And when it turns out they are the danger to humanity, well they just hide it. Biofuels for example.

There are much bigger fish to fry environmentally and you really shouldn't be doin that either (finite amount of fish.


Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:40 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 am
Posts: 12700
Location: The Right Side of the Pennines (metaphorically & geographically)
Reply with quote
The biggest problem: Increasing population.
Yet the only country to tackle that (China) has been slagged off world wide for it's efforts.

_________________
pcernie wrote:
'I'm going to snort this off your arse - for the benefit of government statistics, of course.'


Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:41 am
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
What really winds me up is the history books will probably say the various agreements were what turned things around, and kids will be brought up to believe that :(

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:18 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.